According to tradition, it was on this day that Reuben brought mandrakes to his mother, Leah. It’s recorded in Genesis 30:
“Now Reuben went in the days of wheat harvest and found mandrakes in the field, and brought them to his mother Leah. Then Rachel said to Leah, ‘Please give me some of your son’s mandrakes.’ But she said to her, ‘Is it a small matter that you have taken away my husband? Would you take away my son’s mandrakes also?’ And Rachel said, ‘Therefore he will lie with you tonight for your son’s mandrakes.’” (Genesis 30:14-15)
This is one of those stories in Scripture that baffles people, theologians included, because there doesn’t seem to be any real meaning to it. At the very least, its meaning seems to elude a clear understanding. There are rabbinical sources that hint at a hidden meaning in the fact that Reuben brought mandrakes, which were plants believed to contain some kind of medicinal property. They claim the mandrakes (in Hebrew duda’im) promoted better eyesight, as well as being good for human fertility.
These claims about the mandrakes coupled with the fact there existed a great deal of tension between Leah and her sister, Rachel, might explain why the boy brought these plants to his mother. She was considered to be weak in the eyes. These rabbinic claims might also explain why Rachel was so determined to obtain some of the mandrakes – at this point, she had not conceived.
Rachel was given some of the mandrakes, but she didn’t get pregnant. To the contrary, when Jacob went into Leah’s tent that night, it was she who conceived and it was by her that another son, Issachar, was added to the family. Obviously, the mandrakes were no help to Rachel in the baby department. Because both of these women were reared in a pagan land, perhaps that’s why they thought these mandrakes possessed some kind of property that would help them, whether it was Leah’s eyes or Rachel’s barrenness. Yet, the Scripture demonstrates that the plants did not help either of them. Moreover, Leah conceived without the mandrakes and Rachel, with the mandrakes, didn’t conceive.
The reality is that God hearkened unto Leah and she conceived. Later on in Scripture, we are told that God “remembered Rachel” (Genesis 30:22), hearkened unto her and she conceived. Here’s the point: plants had nothing to do with Israel growing as a nation and the development of the 12 tribes – that was all God’s doing.
There are, no doubt, those in the Body who believe that if they do something in a particular way according to their tradition, they are guaranteed a specific outcome. There are those who believe that if a certain formula worked successfully in the past, it should prove to be successful again and again. For instance, many of us grew up believing that if we sang the right songs at the right tempo, and at the right volume, and if the preacher preached loud enough and long enough, something good was bound to happen. Sometimes it did but sometimes it didn’t – here’s why.
God never seems to respond to man’s traditions and man’s formulas. We think God should do certain things if we faithfully follow our traditions. What we sometimes fail to recognize is that what we now consider to be a fail-proof tradition may have started when God initially responded to a contrite heart and humble spirit. Scripture teaches us that God hears the prayers of the righteous and He has compassion on those who seek Him in humility. Therefore, formulas derived from man’s wisdom don’t work when we need a miracle. Perhaps the best way for us to realize a miracle is to give up on our methods, our formulas and traditions and commit ourselves to walk in obedience to our Creator. Let’s block out all the noise that we may hear His voice speak to us. and then believe in His faithfulness. That’s how miracles occur.
God hearkened unto Leah. He remembered Rachel and that’s how Israel became a nation.
Love your teachings. I have a question that I can’t seem to get an answer to. Why do believers worship on Sunday when the Sabbath was always Saturday. I know it was changed but should it have been and are Christians under “The Law?”
Desiring to do what is pleasing in His sight without being in bondage to the traditions of men.
Nancy. Thanks for your comments. As far as your question: Sounds like you already know why Sunday has become the primary day of congregational worship for Christianity. I assume your question is why do they continue to meet on Sunday? For me, the issue isn’t about which day of the week we choose to meet on because, initially, Sabbath was about being a day of rest rather than a day of corporate worship. Obviously, when an entire nation is not working, they would tend to congregate together and study, pray, etc. My point is, I don’t take issue with someone who worships on Sunday or Tuesday or Friday or Saturday. My issue is those who regard a day other than the seventh day as the Sabbath. I believe there is a difference. As to why some continue in this way – I think its as simple as this: no one likes to change. That’s just my thoughts. Blessings and shalom. Bill
Hello Pastor Cloud. Do you mind if I call you Pastor Cloud? I enjoyed this lesson very much. It made me think of the world’s reliance on science and medicine for a cure in this current pandemic instead of seeking God’s face in the matter. What are your thoughts on vaccines and how they are created?
Each person has to make up their own mind on the matter but I’m extremely leery of the overabundance of vaccines. Shalom.